From 27 September 2026, EU Regulation 2024/825 ("Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition") radically tightens the rules on environmental claims. This complete guide explains clearly what the EmpCo Directive covers, which claims are prohibited, who is affected and how to identify compliance risks in your business.
Last updated: 25 April 2026 · Reading time approx. 18 minutes
The EmpCo Directive is officially Directive (EU) 2024/825 empowering consumers for the green transition through better protection against unfair practices and through better information — in short: the Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition Directive. It was adopted on 28 February 2024 by the European Parliament and the Council and published in the Official Journal of the EU on 6 March 2024. It amends the two central consumer-law directives — the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (UCPD, 2005/29/EC) and the Consumer Rights Directive (CRD, 2011/83/EU).
The background is an empirical study by the European Commission from 2020, in which more than half of the environmental claims examined in advertising were rated as vague, misleading or unsubstantiated. More than 40 % proved to be entirely unfounded. The European Parliament responded with a clear political mandate: anyone who advertises "green" must be able to prove it — and anyone who cannot must not advertise at all.
Germany transposes the EmpCo into national law via the Third Act Amending the UWG. The amendments principally affect the Act Against Unfair Competition (UWG); the provisions central to environmental claims apply from 27 September 2026. Anyone still advertising today with terms such as "carbon neutral", "sustainable" or "eco-friendly" has only a few months left to revise their external communications.
The centrepiece of the EmpCo Directive is the new set of per-se prohibitions inserted into Annex I of the UCPD — that is, practices that are unfair in all circumstances and therefore prohibited without any further balancing exercise. The EmpCo extends the list of unfair commercial practices by four core environmental offences.
Generic environmental claims without recognised evidence are prohibited. These include terms such as sustainable, eco-friendly, ecological, green, climate-friendly or natural. From 27 September 2026 these terms may only be used where their recognised excellent environmental performance is verifiable on the same web page or in the same advertising medium.
Example — prohibited: "Our sustainable packaging protects the environment." → Without concrete evidence (e.g. recycling rate, ISO 14021) this is forbidden. Permitted would be: "Packaging made from 87 % post-consumer recyclate, certified to ISO 14021."
Advertising claims such as carbon neutral, CO₂ neutral, climate positive or carbon zero that rest on the mere offsetting of greenhouse gas emissions are absolutely prohibited from 27 September 2026 — even if the offsetting projects are certified. The legislature takes the view that consumers falsely assume the advertised product has no climate impact of its own.
Example — prohibited: "Carbon-neutral chocolate through offsetting certified CO₂ projects." → Also impermissible even with "voluntarily offset". More detail in the article: Carbon neutral banned 2026.
Companies may no longer use self-designed sustainability seals, logos or quality marks unless these are based on a recognised, externally audited certification scheme. The EmpCo requires every label to rest on publicly available award criteria and to be overseen by an independent third party. Pure marketing logos such as "Eco-Choice", "Green Star" or comparable proprietary creations are effectively dead.
Statements such as "Carbon neutral by 2030" or "Net Zero by 2040" are only permissible where a clearly defined, time-bound and publicly accessible implementation plan exists that is regularly reviewed by independent experts. Mere PR promises without underlying measures are prohibited. Anyone advertising for the future must already be able to deliver today — in the form of a transparent, verifiable roadmap document.
The EmpCo Directive is transposed nationally — in your jurisdiction the national transposition and its enforcement apply. The example below is Germany, where infringements can be sanctioned on three levels, each of which can become an existential threat. Anyone who thinks "as long as nobody sues me, I will carry on" significantly underestimates the litigation density of German consumer protection organisations.
The regular consequences of an infringement are a cease-and-desist demand, an injunction and damages. The directive is transposed nationally; the fine itself is governed by the CPC Regulation (EU) 2017/2394 and applies only in EU-coordinated CPC enforcement proceedings: as a rule up to EUR 50,000, and — where the annual turnover exceeds EUR 1.25 million — up to 4 % of the annual turnover achieved in the affected member state. In Germany this is implemented, e.g., via § 19 UWG. For a group with EUR 200 million in German turnover, 4 % would be up to EUR 8 million per infringement. Where the turnover cannot be estimated, the maximum is EUR 2 million.
Even before the EmpCo cut-off date, the BGH (Federal Court of Justice) has set the bar high. The ruling Katjes I ZR 98/23 of 27 June 2024 makes clear that advertising as "carbon neutral" on product packaging without a clear explanation of the term is misleading. Consumers must be able to understand whether the product itself was manufactured in a carbon-neutral manner or is merely offset. The BGH requires transparent disclosure at the point of advertising itself — footnotes or links to explanatory pages do not suffice.
Deutsche Umwelthilfe (DUH) has stepped up its action against greenwashing since 2022 and has brought numerous proceedings — for example against TotalEnergies (advertising "CO₂-offset heating oil", Düsseldorf Regional Court) and against Apple (advertising a "carbon-neutral" Apple Watch, Frankfurt am Main Regional Court). Under § 8(3) UWG, qualified consumer associations under § 4 UKlaG (such as the Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband, vzbv) and qualified trade associations also have standing to sue. In addition, competitors can issue warning letters under the UWG — and in practice are often the first to arrive with a costly cease-and-desist demand.
A first warning letter costs between EUR 1,500 and EUR 6,000 in legal fees — per challenged claim. Anyone who does not submit risks an interim injunction with additional court costs. Detailed cost tables and practical examples can be found in the guide EmpCo Directive: Summary for SMEs.
Unlike some EU regulations with size thresholds (CSRD, CSDDD), the EmpCo Directive makes no distinction between large companies and SMEs. It is addressed to every trader who makes advertising claims about environmental properties, carbon neutrality or sustainability to consumers.
Even a sole trader with an online shop or landing page is affected. There are no exemptions based on small-business status.
SMEs are covered as well; the UWG provides no relief based on company size.
Only in EU-coordinated CPC enforcement proceedings (Art. 21 Reg. 2017/2394; in Germany, e.g. § 19 UWG) can the fine reach up to 4 % of the turnover achieved in the affected member state where annual turnover exceeds EUR 1.25 million (capped at EUR 2 million where it can only be estimated). The directive is transposed nationally — in your jurisdiction the national transposition and its sanctions apply. The regular consequences of an infringement are a cease-and-desist demand, an injunction and damages.
All communication directed at consumers (website, packaging, TV, radio, online advertising, influencer posts) falls under the EmpCo.
Pure B2B communication is not the primary target, but is still indirectly affected: suppliers who pass on greenwashing claims risk damages claims from their buyers.
Platforms such as Amazon, eBay or Etsy face increasing liability when sellers spread greenwashing claims on their platform.
Sector-specific risks? The industry guides show which terms are typical in which sector and which are particularly dangerous: Food, Fashion & Textiles, Energy, Finance, Tourism.
The EmpCo Directive refers to "commercial communication" — a deliberately broad term. It covers every form of external business communication capable of influencing consumers in their purchasing decision. Concretely, this means:
Important: Even older content published before 27 September 2026 falls under the new rules. There is no grandfather clause for existing content. Anyone who, for example, runs a 2020 blog article advertising something as "carbon neutral" must update that article by the cut-off date or take it offline — otherwise it counts as prohibited commercial communication from 28 September 2026.
The EmpCo expressly permits environmental claims provided they are based on recognised certification schemes or independently verified standards. The following overview lists the most important recognised forms of evidence — they are effectively the toolkit for substantiable green communication.
International standard for environmental management systems. External certification by accredited bodies such as TÜV, DEKRA or DQS.
EU-wide harmonised ecolabel with lifecycle assessment. Only available for product categories with published award criteria.
German ecolabel since 1978. Awarded by RAL gGmbH based on criteria from the Federal Environment Agency.
Certificates for sustainable forestry. Full chain-of-custody evidence required for timber and paper products.
Global Organic Textile Standard — organic fibres and minimum social standards in textiles.
EU Eco-Management and Audit Scheme. Considerably more rigorous than ISO 14001, with a public environmental statement.
Science Based Targets initiative — science-based reduction targets compatible with the 1.5 °C pathway.
Circularity certificate at Bronze to Platinum levels, with a material health assessment.
Textiles tested for harmful substances; recognised for clothing, home textiles and baby products.
More on concrete wordings with supporting evidence can be found in the guide Carbon-neutral alternatives: 15 substantiable formulations.
Anyone advertising with future commitments — for example "We will be carbon neutral by 2035" — must demonstrate an elaborated transition plan under the EmpCo. The plan is effectively a climate protection roadmap and must meet the following minimum requirements:
For companies already subject to the CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive), the effort is manageable — transition plans are already required there. For SMEs that are not subject to the CSRD, however, the requirement is substantial. A clean solution: either substantiate future commitments with a verified plan — or forgo such claims entirely and instead advertise achieved reductions.
In Germany, the EmpCo Directive is implemented through the Act Against Unfair Competition (UWG). Three provisions are particularly relevant:
§ 5 UWG prohibits misleading commercial practices in general. Through the EmpCo, the catalogue of offences falling under § 5 is extended: in future, any environmental claim not substantiated by recognised standards will be deemed misleading — and therefore an infringement of § 5 UWG.
§ 5a UWG also covers the withholding of material information. Anyone who advertises as "carbon neutral" without disclosing the certification basis or without explaining the role of offsetting infringes § 5a UWG. That was precisely the core of the BGH Katjes ruling.
Analogously to Annex I UCPD, the German UWG contains an annex to § 3(3) listing practices that are per se unfair. That annex is extended by the EmpCo with new numbers (including 2a, 4a, 4b, 4c, 10a and 23d) — covering carbon-neutrality claims based on offsetting, generic environmental claims and impermissible own labels.
Create a UWG risk matrix for your website: list all environmental terms in a table and assign them — § 3(3) UWG (per-se prohibition, remove immediately), § 5 UWG (misleading, evidence required), non-critical (purely descriptive factual statement). A free automated version is provided by the Greenwashing Check.
The EmpCo and the Green Claims Directive (GCD) are frequently confused or treated as the same thing. They are in fact two related but substantively different legislative acts:
In other words: EmpCo is the prohibition norm, GCD will be the evidence norm. Anyone who is EmpCo-compliant has already cleared two thirds of the GCD hurdle — but the additional LCA documentation required will still need to come on top. It is therefore worth starting data collection for future substantiation obligations now.
There are only a few months left until 27 September 2026. Anyone who starts now will comfortably meet the deadline. The following 8-step plan is the tried-and-tested roadmap for EmpCo-compliant external communications:
Collect all texts: website, online shop, packaging, social-media posts, newsletters, adverts. Use automated scanners such as Empcora to identify all problematic terms in one go.
Tag each hit as (a) per-se prohibition (Annex I UCPD 2005/29, as amended by the EmpCo Directive 2024/825 — transposed nationally, e.g. in Germany the Annex to § 3(3) UWG), (b) generic environmental claim potentially misleading under the national misleading-practices rule (in Germany, e.g. § 5 UWG), or (c) purely descriptive factual statement. The EU directive is the common basis; in your jurisdiction the national transposition applies.
Create an evidence folder for each permissible claim: certificates, methodological documentation, measurement data, independent expert opinions. This collection is your defence line in any dispute.
For every flagged claim, document the exact location (page, packaging, post) and the relevant legal basis. A scanner such as Empcora returns each finding together with the applicable provision — it checks only and does not provide legal advice or wording suggestions.
Self-designed sustainability logos without a recognised certification scheme fall under the per-se prohibition. Identify which labels rest on an externally audited certification scheme and which do not.
If you advertise with future commitments: draw up a climate protection roadmap with concrete measures, investments, Scope-1-2-3 separation and external verification. Publish it on your own domain.
Train marketing, PR and social-media teams. Add an EmpCo clause to your style guide. Introduce a four-eyes principle for every piece of advertising copy with an environmental reference.
Websites change constantly. Set up a monthly re-scan. This way, new infringements are caught before warning-letter lawyers discover them.
A detailed step-by-step guide with templates can be found in the article Making your website EmpCo-compliant: step by step. Anyone in a hurry should keep an eye on the countdown: EmpCo deadline September 2026: what needs to happen before then.
The most common questions from more than 200 client conversations with SMEs, marketing managers and in-house counsel — structured and answered.
The EmpCo Directive (Empowering Consumers for the Green Transition, EU 2024/825) is an EU directive of 28 February 2024 designed to protect consumers from misleading environmental claims and unreliable sustainability labels. Germany transposes it into the UWG via the Third Act Amending the UWG. The new prohibitions apply from 27 September 2026 to all forms of commercial communication.
The substantive prohibitions (per-se prohibitions, generic environmental terms, own labels, transition plans) apply in Germany from 27 September 2026. Until then, businesses have time to bring their websites, packaging, adverts and social-media accounts into line with the new requirements.
The EmpCo Directive is transposed nationally, so the precise sanctions depend on your jurisdiction. The regular consequences of an infringement are a cease-and-desist demand, an injunction and damages. The fine is governed by the CPC Regulation (EU) 2017/2394: in EU-coordinated CPC enforcement proceedings (Art. 21) it can reach up to 4 % of the company's annual turnover in the affected member state (where turnover exceeds EUR 1.25 million; otherwise as a rule up to EUR 50,000, and a maximum of EUR 2 million where turnover cannot be estimated). In Germany this is implemented, e.g., via § 19 UWG. Competition-law warning letters, injunctions and damages claims may come, for example, from qualified consumer associations or competitors.
Yes. The EmpCo does not distinguish by company size. Any trader who makes environmental claims to consumers — whether a sole trader, an SME, a mid-sized company or a corporation — is subject to the prohibition. The only indirect relief available is through the UWG, for example on the element of fault for minor infringements.
Yes. Recognised labels with independent third-party verification — for example EU Ecolabel, Blauer Engel, FSC, PEFC, GOTS, OEKO-TEX, Fairtrade, Cradle to Cradle, EMAS or ISO 14001 — may continue to be used. What is prohibited are company-own sustainability labels without a certification scheme and labels whose award criteria are not publicly verifiable.
A per-se prohibition means that the relevant claim is automatically deemed misleading — without any case-by-case assessment. There is no enquiry into whether the advertising could actually mislead consumers. Example: "carbon neutral" based on offset certificates is absolutely prohibited from 27 September 2026 — even if the certificates are credible and verifiable.
The EmpCo Directive (EU 2024/825) has already been adopted and applies from 27 September 2026. It governs the prohibition of misleading environmental claims and unreliable labels. The Green Claims Directive (GCD) is still in the EU legislative process and will add substantiation obligations — that is, the question of how a company must scientifically back up a permitted environmental claim. In short: EmpCo penalises unlawful claims; the GCD will tighten the evidential requirements for lawful ones.
More than 60 additional questions can be found in our FAQ database.
Enter your URL and our EmpCo scanner automatically shows all problematic terms as findings, including the relevant legal basis. Checking only, not legal advice. Free of charge, no registration, no credit card.
Last updated: 25 April 2026 · Published: 20 April 2026 · Author: Empcora Editorial Team
